This past November, President Trump issued pardons for two convicted war criminals, Major Mathew Golsteyn and First Lieutenant Clint Lorance, and reversed the demotion of another, Navy SEAL Chief Petty Officer Eddie Gallagher (of no relation to this here scribe).
Made in the midst of impeachment buildup, the decision caused a firestorm in the military and in veterans’ communities — proponents saw it as evidence that the president was honoring his recurring pledge to “love our military.” Detractors argued that it was an act of political opportunism, one that both attacked the military justice system and normalized the abnormal for a citizenry largely removed from the realities of modern war.
Why yes, dear reader, I am one of those detractors.
The theme of this March-April issue is “Health.” Because I’m a contrarian pain in the ass, I saw this as an opportunity to explore the unhealthy nature of these recent presidential pardons. Our republic is unwell, and these pardons do not help.
No one was more responsible for these three servicemembers’ cases getting the attention of the president than Pete Hegseth, an Iraq war veteran and weekend Fox & Friends host best known for talking to average joes in diners.
Before washing up on the shores of Fox News Island, Hegseth fronted a Koch brothers-funded veterans’ organization and advocated for the privatization of VA health care. Through those connections and a mutual distaste for normal D.C. operations, Hegseth gained the president’s ear. When the nonprofit military justice advocacy group United American Patriots approached Hegseth with their cases, it was only a matter of time before Hegseth in turn brought them to the White House.
During the slow, often public march toward the pardons, Hegseth hosted the spouses of the war criminals on Fox & Friends and made the case that, “The benefit of the doubt should go to the guys pulling the trigger.” Which is a compelling argument, at least in a vacuum, as anyone who’s operated in the messy grays of combat is inclined to grant. I sure am.
Except, well, almost no one involved in these situations actually pulled a fucking trigger, Hegseth. There’s little messy gray involved in these cases, but a whole lot of black and white. Let’s tackle these pardons and their corresponding details one at a time, shall we?
Lieutenant Lorance: On day three as a platoon leader in combat, this former military policeman gave soldiers under his command the order to shoot at three local men on a motorcycle.
After initially balking and missing the men (perhaps on purpose), the soldiers followed the order. Two of the three Afghans were killed. Lorance subsequently issued a false report about the incident. Nine members of his platoon testified against him at his court-martial, and his company commander, Patrick Swanson, recently said, “The tragedy is that people will hail him as a hero, and he is not a hero. He ordered those murders. He lied about them.” Did Hegseth call this guy “a hero” on Fox News? You know it!
Chief Petty Officer Gallagher: Where to begin? Gallagher had a long, distinguished career in the SEALs, and was decorated for valor multiple times. On his eighth deployment in 2017, during the aftermath of an airstrike in Mosul, Gallagher allegedly executed a wounded teenage ISIS fighter with his knife.
This was the culmination of a series of episodes involving Gallagher and excessive force — some in his platoon later testified to messing with the scope of his rifle so he’d stop shooting innocents. Regardless, Gallagher and others then posed with the dead body of the teen fighter for a trophy photograph. After another SEAL changed his testimony deep in the trial, claiming that he had been the one who’d actually killed the ISIS teen, Gallagher was found not guilty of premeditated murder and attempted murder. (The other SEAL had, of course, already been granted immunity by the prosecution. The code runs deep in the spec ops community.) Gallagher was convicted of posing with the body (hard to walk back that evidence) and initially stripped of his SEAL trident — until President Trump ordered it returned, over the objections of his own Navy Secretary, Richard Spencer, who resigned in protest.
Major Golsteyn: As a Green Beret in Afghanistan during a 2010 deployment, Golsteyn allegedly helped cover up the execution of an alleged Taliban bomb maker and/or executed the bomb maker himself after a direct engagement.
He and others then returned to the village that night to dig up and burn the bomb maker’s body. The story only surfaced later, after Golsteyn mentioned it in a polygraph administered by the CIA during a job interview. Though Golsteyn would make different claims about what happened to the bomb maker and how, he was investigated twice and eventually charged with premeditated murder. His trial had been scheduled for December 2019.
It bears repeating: These were not quick decisions made in the fog of war. Every single one occurred in a space where these soldiers could have thought through what was happening and how to react.
We’re 19 years into these everlong wars. A vast, vast majority of American servicemembers who’ve gone abroad to fight them have held the line in near-impossible situations. There’s absolutely been cases where confusion has led to tragedy. There’s absolutely been cases where soldiers were forced to choose between a bad choice and a worse choice, and it’s led to collateral damage and dead and wounded soldiers. There’s absolutely been a whole lot of moral and ethical dilemmas that offer much in the way of complexity, and little in the way of clarity. Such is war. These sorts of wars, especially.
These aren’t that, though.
These pardons do a disservice to everyone who held that line, or attempted to. They impugn every soldier and Marine who exhibited courageous restraint in moments of great confusion and hazard, often to their own detriment, because that’s what duty meant in the moment.
And now these three pardoned war criminals — Lorance, in particular — are public figures. They’ve campaigned for President Trump at fundraisers. They go on Fox News and hold court like they’re modern-day Spartan soldiers or something. It’s a fucking disgrace. And it’s not over. That advocacy group United American Patriots is now making noise about seeking a pardon for Robert Bales, the staff sergeant who straight-up slaughtered a family of Afghan civilians in cold blood in 2012.
I know we live in the upside-down these days, but this is too much. Yes, they’re hard, yes, they’re often confusing, but the rules of engagement matter. Escalation of force matters. It’s what separates us from the enemy. It’s what separates us from barbarism. They’re part of what makes the American servicemember special.
Our Founder’s Erotic Film “Caligula” gets Rediscovered
Depending on the predisposition of the source, history remembers Bob Guccione either as an ostentatious creative spirit or a ruthlessly clever businessman — the reality probably lies somewhere in the middle. What’s certain is that the Penthouse magazine founder loved a challenge, loved exceeding expectations, and lived to push the envelope, weighing in via his publication on charged social and cultural issues, and highlighting the centrality of sex in human life.
A visual artist who painted, drew, and developed his own aesthetic as a photographer, Guccione inevitably turned his eye to Hollywood and moviemaking. His efforts began in the early 1970s, when the Penthouse company helped bankroll the horror film A Name for Evil and the counterculture drama The Dope Lawyer, while also partnering with Paramount Pictures to assist in financing The Longest Yard, The Day of the Locust, and Chinatown.
Meanwhile, producer Franco Rossellini and author Gore Vidal had begun collaborating on a film about the notorious Roman emperor Caligula, envisioned as a scathing commentary on power and corruption. Their quest for financing led them to Guccione, who saw in the political, brutal, and sexually charged subject matter an opportunity to make a truly revolutionary film.
Under his supervision, Guccione believed that Caligula could deliver a progressive cultural statement to a larger audience than was possible with a men’s magazine. His vision was bold and ambitious, and he was willing to invest heavily to pull off such a momentous undertaking.
“I promised to make a new kind of motion picture, one so innovative in its magnitude that it would fundamentally change the viewing habits of the theatergoing public,” Guccione said in promotional audio accompanying the movie’s release. He added, “If experiencing something that no one has ever felt before is as important to you as it is to me, I recommend that you see and experience Caligula.”
With a massive budget and starring four of England’s most respected actors (Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, Peter O’Toole, and Sir John Gielgud), Caligula was Guccione’s attempt to fuse the scope and star power of a grand Hollywood historical drama with the excitement and audacity of pornographic film and the innovative sensibility of European art cinema.
Evaluated purely from a conceptual standpoint, the film can be said to faithfully
combine these elements. The creative result is less easily defended. Following an issue-plagued production, both Vidal and its Italian director, Tinto Brass, sued to remove their names from the film, and star Malcolm McDowell was publicly recommending that viewers skip the movie altogether. Audiences ignored his advice, and all the scandal only served to sell more tickets.
Released in America in February of 1980, Caligula was a box-office hit, but the reviews were universally brutal. Unfazed, Guccione delighted in the fact that, according to his calculations, by September, Caligula had earned a dazzling profit of $89 million from domestic and international sales.
Between the lawsuits and the production vitriol, it was public knowledge that the version shown in theaters strayed significantly from the visions of both Vidal and Brass. For this reason, cinephiles for years have dreamed of a better Caligula. The notion of a more artful and authoritative cut of the movie became a kind of mythical beast, with some fans carefully comparing releases from different countries and assessing edits through study of mere seconds of variant material, fueled by romantic notions based on behind-the-scenes photos of gorgeous, lost moments.
Guccione pushed conversations about the raw footage away as he proceeded into other arenas, and with each administrative regime change at Penthouse, knowledge of what had become of the materials diminished. The film world reasonably assumed the original footage never left Rome and had been destroyed long ago.
To understand the mystery surrounding the raw elements of Caligula, we have to return to the volatile end of its contentious production.
Shortly after filming was completed, Brass was shocked to find the locks changed at the studio and his editing bed outside in the snow. Meanwhile, Guccione secretly shot footage of Penthouse Pets engaging in hard-core sex in order to finish the film according to his vision.
Guccione had been sneaking the raw negatives out of Italy from mid-production onward, suggesting his plan to commandeer the film was long-gestating. Unlike in America, the Italian film industry prioritizes the rights of the director as a film’s “creator,” and Brass was successful in receiving an injunction against Guccione’s plan to complete the film without his input.
But by the time Brass won his victory in the Italian courts, all of the negatives had been moved to England. Guccione quickly turned to the British courts, who decided in Guccione’s favor, stating that any materials would not be returned to Italy until the settlement of any appeals.
After this temporary win, Guccione’s associates began relocating the negatives in an attempt to stay ahead of any seizure. (One of the first things I noticed when opening the film cans was that they were all recycled from earlier movies, with many of them bearing a confusing handwritten label of “My Son, My Son.” I learned later that this was deceptive coding meant to discourage any examination during transport.)
The legends surrounding the move of the original film materials ranged from Guccione claiming to have carried them all in suitcases (physically impossible) to the negatives being smuggled out of Italy wrapped around the legs of trusted couriers (even more impossible). The truth was far more mundane: Through a combination of palm-greasing and sleight-of-hand, the footage was spirited from England to New York City. Penthouse then reached a legal resolution with Franco Rossellini’s Italian production company, allowing Guccione to complete the film.
The 96 hours of raw footage, the location sound tapes, and other production material eventually made their way to Los Angeles, where for decades they sat in a film-storage facility gathering dust.
The timing of their rescue was nothing short of a miracle — credit for saving the cache goes to Ranjit Sandhu, the academic behind Caligula.org, who tipped off German researcher Alexander Tuschinski in 2018 to where the materials were stored. Tuschinski in turn notified Penthouse, whose new administration were shocked to learn the materials still existed. When the storage facility was contacted, it emerged that the entire collection was literally days away from permanent destruction for unpaid bills. If not for this eleventh-hour exchange, the Caligula footage would have been lost forever.
When the archives were opened, beneath the dust we discovered that the original camera negatives and location sound were in pristine condition, miraculously untouched by time.
While promoting Caligula during a 1980 Penthouse magazine interview, Guccione joked that Tinto Brass had shot enough footage to “make the original version of Ben-Hur about 50 times over.”
This prodigious collection of archival material contains countless goosebump moments. The most exciting aspect? In the rescued footage, McDowell and Mirren deliver breathtaking performances no one has seen for 40 years. Enabled by the unearthing of the original materials, and guided by the narrative of Vidal’s original shooting script and the vision of Tinto Brass, the recut Caligula can be viewed as the discovery of an entirely lost film starring two of the world’s most celebrated actors.
One unforgettable moment involves a scene in the Roman Senate. It exists in the original release, but what is most powerful happens after Guccione’s edit ends. The camera slowly pans up to Mirren as Caesonia, watching her emperor-husband unleash pandemonium upon the Senate. Caesonia looks on, pleased; she releases a coy giggle. As the scene continues, her mood shifts: with a glint in her eye she raises her chin dramatically, surveying the melee below like a satisfied goddess of chaos.
I hope you’ll be watching next autumn when this moment — and many more like it — are presented in Caligula MMXX.
Learn more about the 40th anniversary release of “Caligula” at caligulammxx.com.
After meeting collaborator Matt Hislope in a University of Kansas theater production, he and Hislope moved to Austin, Texas, in 2001, where they founded Rubber Repertory. For ten years the duo staged innovative conceptual theater, work that earned them multiple Austin Chronicle cover stories, including one issue that showed them naked, wrapped in rope, beside an agility tunnel outfitted with human arms.
Rubber Repertory’s productions were sexual, experimental, controversial, and helped “Keep Austin Weird,” as the slogan goes. After leaving Austin in 2013 and founding an artist residency in Lawrence, Kansas, Meyer headed to Los Angeles. He landed a few choice roles in No Country for Old Men, Dope, and Suburbicon, before the hustle started to wear thin.
“Even when your acting career is going really well, it still feels so disempowering,” he tells Penthouse. “I started making art to feel like I had control over something. Something that felt more tangible. I probably also did it so I could have an identity beyond just being an actor. Pretty sure that one out of every four dating-app profiles in L.A. says, ‘No actors,’ so it felt good to be able to hide behind something else.”
Meyer tells us about the time he was in college, when he had a job working at a radio station for the blind. Every Sunday morning, an “alluring woman” would come in to read, and would describe the latest issue of Penthouse for the station’s listeners.
“I’m pretty sure they played it as part of the late-night programming,” he remembers. “Anyways, 20-year-old me was fascinated by her, but I was way too shy to actually initiate a conversation. I do remember smelling the recording booth after she left, though. She wore the headiest scent.”
Meyer’s drawings are freaky, oddball depictions of naked bodies in erotic positions. They also have a trippy Ralph Steadman-like quality when he plays with color, which makes the art seem like it was fueled by PCP.
“I like it when the [body’s] forms become characters or landscapes,” Meyer says. “I like seeing what kinds of strange and kinky stories emerge when body parts from sexual imagery are isolated, layered, and distorted.”
Meyer is not a trained artist. He started sketching for fun, so most of his inspiration comes from other experimental theater types, like Taylor Mac, Deborah Hay, Yoko Ono, and Miranda July. However, Instagram has enabled him to develop his art and grow a following one hashtag and like at a time.
“If we’re getting more into therapy mode, I’m sure part of why I draw erotic art is to signal to the world that I’m a sexual person,” he says. “I do sometimes get self-conscious about all the big boobs I’m drawing, so I’ll start drawing smaller boobs and maybe even some dicks, but that never lasts very long.”
Depending on where you are in the country, you might be enjoying blissful spring warmth or lingering late-winter. Whatever the weather, it’s always a good idea, when indoors, to take off your clothes and get busy. The following Romance Products will help you in your mission, should you choose to accept it.
Dosist Passion Vape Pen
Early twentieth-century anti-“marihuana” propaganda threatened its potential users with a depraved lifestyle of sex and violence after a single toke. But that was then, and this is now. Get stoned, peace out, and fuck, is what we’re trying to say. This petite vape pen, with its 11:1 THC to CBD formula designed for an intense body high, will help get you there. dosist.com / $30
Jack Knob Polish
What if you wanted all the pleasure of being stoned, but didn’t want it to extend beyond the crotch area? After all, some of us have to work in the morning and can’t spend all night getting high and getting down. Well, look no further. The CBD in this water-based lube helps promote blood flow to your junk, which means a longer-lasting, more intense erection, but without the mind fuckage. Say no more, right? cbdcaring.com / $12-$24
Intimate Art Kit
One of my exes had this folded-up canvas in her closet that was covered in blue splotches. When I asked about it, she said she’d gotten naked, rolled around in blue paint, then rolled around on this canvas as part of some yoga cult she’d once been involved in. The premise here is similar, but you don’t have to go to India, you don’t have to join a yoga cult, and you can put the results up on a wall and make your dinner guests eat under your sex art. uncommongoods.com / $60
Position of the Day Playbook
Everyone could use a little help keeping the party going. While some of the 366 positions in this illustrated guide look like they could injure the less flexible among us, most are likely to result in the kind of mind-blowingly athletic sex you’ve been dreaming about since you were a horny teenager reading this magazine. urbanoutfitters.com / $13
CannaMojo
This cannabis-infused male-enhancement pill proposes to get you deliciously high and hard AF. “Full-throttle pleasure for you and your partner,” it predicts. Even if you don’t need help with your boner, the 10mg of weed in each pill will give you a relaxed, anxiety-free buzz, while increasing desire and sensitivity, and intensifying your orgasm. What’s not to like? cannamojo710.com / $10 a dose
New Indulgence Hotel Kits
One of the best things you can do for your sex life is rent a sweet hotel room and go to town on each other like you’re conducting a torrid affair on the Amalfi Coast. These kits—which include condoms, lube, and other sensual accoutrement—are perfect for that kind of getaway, or even just for bringing the hotel back to your bedroom. newindulgence.com / $42-$45
Eye of Love, Pheromone Cologne
Featuring a blend of lemongrass, mint, and sandalwood, this cologne is designed to accentuate your pheromones (the sex chemicals your body excretes), thereby getting whoever is lucky enough to sit near you all hot and bothered. It’s basically going to turbocharge your attractiveness without you having to do all the hard work of going to the gym. eyeoflove.com / $54
Born and raised in Boston, Earl Miller was enrolled in medical school when he got a taste for the arts. He switched his sights to acting, relocated to New York, and attended the prestigious Neighborhood Playhouse conservatory. Soon, he landed roles off-Broadway and on TV. But when the lighting director of a play he was in suddenly quit and Miller stepped in to do the job, he discovered he liked working behind the scenes. So began the journey that led to his true calling: photography. In 1967, he used his tax refund to buy a camera, and before long his career as a lensman took off.
Miller shot commercial campaigns, took celebrity headshots, and even toured with Sonny and Cher as their personal photographer. But it wasn’t until he picked up a 1972 issue of this magazine that he knew he wanted to photograph beautiful women. He submitted some of his work, and Guccione bought it. The two men went on to develop a creative partnership, and the Miller images Guccione published would burn themselves into the brains of countless Penthouse readers.
“[Guccione] told me that he firmly believed the magazine was a richer experience for the reader if it presented a wider range of visual artistry,” Miller told Adult Video News in 2010. “Rather than force his creative people to shoot in a particular style, he encouraged photographers to find their own vision and reach their own level of artistry.”
Here, we celebrate the decades-long collaboration between Earl Miller and Bob Guccione by sharing some of Miller’s work, and getting the photographer’s memories as he recounts one unforgettable shoot.
Miller recalls his shoot with 1980 Penthouse Pet of the Year, Cheryl Rixon:
“It was the winter of 1980. Bob Guccione had sent me to Tempe, Arizona, to shoot a special layout for the July 1980 issue of Penthouse featuring Pet of the Year, Cheryl Rixon. Cheryl was riding high and had just played her first mainstream film role in Columbia Pictures’ comedy Used Cars, starring Kurt Russell and Jack Warden. A PR guy at Columbia was also my production manager, so he was able to arrange whatever film location I wanted to use for Cheryl’s spread. My favorite location was way out in the desert where I knew we would have total privacy. This particular spot was the derelict fuselage of a DC-3 airplane, which was used as Kurt Russell’s office in Used Cars. It was freezing cold that day. I have a vivid memory of my crew and I bundled in heavy winter gear. Meanwhile, Cheryl had to lay her perfect naked body on that frigid metal plane.
“Cheryl got an unexpected audience that day on set. My PR friend forgot to mention that several truckloads of Tempe Teamsters [hired by Columbia Pictures] would be showing up to strike the props. As luck would have it they all rolled up right after Cheryl got completely naked on top of the plane. Oh crap, there goes my privacy, I thought, assuming that Cheryl would want to halt production until they left. Man, I sure was wrong. Cheryl just loved the extra attention. She performed like a star for those guys as they trudged props back and forth to their trucks. With an audience of men gawking at her, Cheryl forgot all about the freezing weather and strutted her stuff like no one else. Plus, the Teamsters got a bonus that day they never forgot.”
Bottom line, it seems good to be Earl. Cheryl Rixon, btw…
There a scene in the 1992 movie American Me where actor William Forsythe, who plays J.D., a Slavic-American character based on the legendary Mexican Mafia gang leader Joe “Pegleg” Morgan, hits a California prison yard as a newbie and is confronted by white inmates.
J.D. responds in fluent Spanish. Moments later, a group of Mexican-American gangsters roll up, glare at the “peckerwoods,” and embrace J.D. as one of their own.
As the scene extends, one of the Latino inmates questions Santana, the gang’s shot caller, about J.D. hanging with them. Santana kills the issue by letting the dude know this Anglo was one of them, a homeboy with heart, courage, and discipline.
“Pegleg” Morgan — born Joseph Megjugorac in 1929 in Los Angeles, the son of Croatian immigrants — rose to become a real-life shot caller in the vicious Mexican Mafia gang, founded by 13 Mexican-Americans in a California youth prison in 1957.
This crew, also known as La Eme (Spanish for the letter M), rapidly gained in size and strength, using intimidation, extortion, and murder, both inside and outside the California prison system. Controlling territory, trafficking drugs, and terrorizing anyone who resisted their demands or threatened their power, La Eme became a dominant, entrenched, moneymaking force throughout the Golden State. And as its lethal footprint expanded, its Slavic-American player became one of the most powerful gangsters in the United States.
“Joe Morgan was a nails-tough Croatian who grew up in a Hispanic neighborhood in East L.A.,” says true-crime author and Gangster Report founder Scott Burnstein. “In total, he spent 40 years locked up for crimes ranging from bank robbery to homicide. He escaped jail twice, committed murders like he had a license, and developed, for La Eme, lucrative, power-boosting connections to both Mexican drug cartels and the Italian mafia in L.A.”
With his shaved head, burning eyes, dark eyebrows, and prosthetic leg (a result of being shot by cops while on the lam), Morgan had the right look to match his steely character. He
was smart, ruthless, charismatic, strategic, and lived by strict rules — a code he expected his associates to live by, too. Morgan, who died in 1993, helped spearhead the Mexican Mafia’s evolution into the baddest prison-spawned gang to ever do it —
a California kingpin with a big vision and ceaseless drive, a killer whose lengthy leadership status within La Eme puts him in
the conversation with marquee gangsters like John Gotti and Pablo Escobar.
“Although Slavic ethnically, Morgan adopted Mexican ways and spoke Spanish perfectly,” recalls Richard Valdemar, a Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department gang investigator for 33 years, now retired. “As a kid, he joined one of the Maravilla gangs in East Los Angeles. He’s unusual because he’s a white boy who grew up in the projects. If you met him and hung out with him for just a few moments, you’d forget he was white, though. Joe didn’t fake it.”
Despite being a güero — a light-skinned person — Morgan had a bone-deep connection to L.A.’s vato loco underworld, its subculture of Mexican-American street gangs and gangbangers. He developed a command of Mexican-Spanish slang. Raised in the barrios, he was a Chicano at heart, a guy who identified as Mexican-American, and who also, from early on, happened to be one of the baddest motherfuckers around. By his late teens, he stood well over six feet tall, and projected an intense, intimidating vibe. In 1946, still just 16, he took up with a 32-year-old married woman, Elvira Rojo, who eventually offered him $1,000 to kill her husband. Morgan did the deed early one September morning, walking into the room where Rojo’s 52-year-old husband was sleeping and bashing his skull with a hammer. He transported the corpse into the Malibu hills and buried his victim in a shallow grave.
“While awaiting trial for murder in the L.A. County Jail, Morgan keyed in on his cellmate William Westbrook, another 16-year-old who was being transferred to a juvenile forestry camp,” says Chris Kasparoza, author of the mob novel For Blood and Loyalty. “Morgan posed as Westbrook and escaped, making it no shock that he went on to become a leader in what the government has alleged is the most dangerous prison gang ever.”
How did a teenager hoodwink prison staff and actually gain his freedom for a time? In an early display of his craftiness, brains, and daring, Morgan studied Westbrook’s mannerisms, practiced his signature, and threatened his cellmate’s life if he didn’t go along with the young killer’s ruse. When guards came to transfer Westbrook to the camp, Morgan impersonated his cellmate and Westbrook stayed silent. After forging his signature on a booking slip, Morgan, sans handcuffs, got into a car with a probation officer.
At San Fernando Boulevard and Colorado Street in Glendale, Morgan jumped from the car, took off, and escaped. The sheriff’s department didn’t realize a cold-blooded homicide suspect had gotten away until hours later. The young criminal was now a fugitive, a wanted man, and he made page two of the Los Angeles Times with his ballsy escape.
It was the beginning of Morgan’s outlaw legend. And unlike many prison escapees, this canny 16-year-old from the mean streets of East L.A. wasn’t immediately recaptured.
“They got him a couple weeks later,” says Christian Cipollini, an organized-crime historian and founder of the site Gangland Legends. “Cops got a tip on his whereabouts, and when they showed up, Morgan took off. An officer shot him in the leg, shattering bone, and stopping Morgan in his tracks. Due to complications, his leg was amputated just below the knee and Morgan ended up with a prosthetic. That led to the authorities and media dubbing him ‘Pegleg,’ although prison lore holds no one ever called him Pegleg to his face.”
Convicted of second-degree murder, Morgan was sent to Folsom State Prison instead of a juvenile facility, due to his “criminal sophistication,” as the judge put it. Despite being the youngest inmate to ever hit the yard, Morgan received mad props at the prison, where he served nine years. With his story and Elvira’s photo in the newspapers often, Morgan became a jailhouse celebrity. (To his fellow prisoners, having sex with an attractive woman twice his age was a grand caper.)
Gangster Report’s Burnstein picks up the story from here.
“In July of 1955, Morgan was paroled, but he wasn’t out in the world for long,” Burnstein recounts. “On November 30, 1955, he robbed a West Covina bank of $17,000 with a machine gun. The FBI arrested him at a bar in Long Beach a week later. He was sent back to state prison — a convicted murderer, bank robber, and escape risk.”
When Morgan was apprehended following the bank heist, the Los Angeles Times headline read, “Hammer Slayer Held in $17,000 Bank Hold-Up.” The press coverage reminded everyone that the same guy who walked into a bank with a rapid-fire weapon like some kind of golden-age gangster — John Dillinger, say, or Machine Gun Kelly — was the teenage Romeo who took a hammer to the head of his married sweetheart’s husband.
Incarcerated at San Quentin, Morgan continued to build his criminal legend. Though in terms of daily prison life, Morgan was known for conducting himself as a gentleman around jailors and fellow prisoners, when it came time to enforce or expand his gang’s power, he could flip a switch, and — like Dr. Jekyll becoming Mr. Hyde — become capable of killing someone with his bare hands or otherwise do what was needed to get the job done.
Despite the prosthetic leg, he was not limited much physically, and was one of the better handball players on the yard, an aptitude which only added to his status.
At meals, Morgan sat with Latino prisoners and formed ties with those who would form the core of the Mexican Mafia. He became a mentor of sorts to members of the newly born La Eme, teaching them how to do time at San Quentin.
“Joe had a reputation from the start at San Quentin, because his homeboys in Maravilla were probably the largest segment of incarcerated gang members,” says retired investigator Valdemar. “If someone called him a white boy, he would have killed him. He knew what his genes were, but his heart was Chicano.”
A natural-born leader, Morgan influenced La Eme before he became a member. “He became the new gang’s first counselor and later its business guru,” says crime expert and documentary filmmaker Al Profit, director of the American Dope series. “He studied Aztec history and formed solid relationships with gang carnales like ‘Hatchet’ Mike Ison and Ruben ‘Rube’ Soto. Back then, prisoners tended to settle their disputes with their fists. But when La Eme came along, they started making and hiding weapons in strategic places on the yard, so they could grab them when things jumped off.”
On February 24, 1961, after being subpoenaed to act as a witness in the trial of a man who murdered a San Quentin inmate, Morgan masterminded an 11-man escape from the L.A. County Jail using lock-picking tools and hacksaws hidden in his artificial leg. The inmates made their getaway through a pipe shaft. Again Morgan made the news. A splashy front-page Los Angeles Times story called it the jail’s largest escape ever.
“Talk about street cred and cleverness,” says Christian Cipollini, commenting on the jailbreak and Morgan’s resourcefulness in bringing it about. This time Morgan remained at large for a week before being captured at a store in West L.A.
“When he walked back onto the yard in San Quentin, he was a California prison legend who’d escaped more than once and had served 14 years, mostly at Folsom. He learned the Aztec language and taught others so they could communicate in code. He was a master negotiator, an expert on doing time, and had connections with all the racial groups.”
“La Eme formed at D.V.I. — the Deuel Vocational Institution — a California youth prison that housed the state’s most violent teenage inmates,” says Chris Kasparoza. “Legend has it that it was the brainchild of a then 16-year-old Luis ‘Huero Buff’ Flores, who brought together the toughest, smartest, most dangerous members of various Mexican-American street gangs at D.V.I., mostly from the barrios of East Los Angeles, uniting them. It was like a ‘special forces’ of teenage gang members who ruled their youth prison yard.”
It wasn’t long before these first La Eme soldados were transferred to maximum-security adult prisons like San Quentin, with prison officials hoping the transfers would kill the fledging Hispanic gang in the cradle. That didn’t happen. La Eme members recruited even more ruthless and murderous Mexican-American inmates into their ranks, and learned lessons about criminality, organizing, and securing power from people like Morgan.
“The Mexican Mafia did not materialize in the streets, it formed within prison confines, probably out of necessity. Like virtually any other prison gang, these guys needed to stick together to survive and thrive,” says Cipollini. “The idea soon morphed into creating not just a gang, but a super-gang. Eventually that evolution created vast outside connections and reach, but of course that kind of expansion also produced enemies.”
In 1969, at the age of 40, Morgan was sponsored by his friend “Hachet” Mike Ison and joined La Eme, becoming the organization’s first member with non-Mexican blood.
Morgan was given the Aztec name “Cocoliso” and was immediately accepted into the inner circle. Up until that point, he’d been acting in an advisory capacity. Embracing his role as a Mexican Mafia soldier, he proposed operations and began scheming from day one.
“La Eme was founded on the principle that every man is equal and the gang operated on a one-man/one-vote, majority-rules system,” says Al Profit. “Leaving their individual rivalries in the street, the top gangsters merged into a single crew. Joining required a formal sponsorship. A made member had to speak up for the individual being considered for membership and take responsibility for them. La Eme was recruiting gangsters with serious criminal résumés who weren’t afraid to use violence as an intimidation tool.”
In addition to being fearless, intelligent, and ambitious, Morgan was willing to kill when and wherever for La Eme. In the pen they say, “Boys fight and men kill.” La Eme gained a reputation for killing with abandon. Side by side with all the violence, though, there was an emphasis on mental discipline, thinking ahead, and studying.
Morgan, especially, believed in the benefit of hitting the books. Determined to be the best gangster he could be, he pushed his brothers to read classics like Machiavelli’s The Prince and Sun Tzu’s The Art of War to gain insights into maintaining power and battling enemies.
Other books Morgan encouraged La Eme members to read were Grey’s Anatomy, to learn about the body and its vulnerabilities so as to maximize damage in shank attacks, and primers on martial arts and weapons. Morgan wanted to exploit every possible advantage, from knowledge of murder methods to big-picture strategizing, in his quest to make La Eme the dominant gang force in the California prison system and on the streets.
“For a long time, there’d been a close association between the Aryan Brotherhood and the Mexican Mafia because they have the same gang enemy — the Black Guerrilla Family,” Cipollini of Gangland Legends points out. “It was the Mexican Mafia who first challenged the BGF. But La Eme was also battling with another, newer Hispanic gang, Nuestra Familia. About the time that Joe Morgan came on the scene, the BGF and NF formed an alliance. The lines were drawn in the sand. That took things to a whole other level.”
In 1972, there was a bloodbath in the California system. Thirty-six prisoners were killed that year and gang experts believe the Mexican Mafia was responsible for 30 of the killings. Race riots raged at Folsom and San Quentin. There were constant, major conflicts between black and Latino inmates. It was sparked by a La Eme hit put on a BGF soldier at San Quentin. In Chris Blatchford’s The Black Hand, Rene “Boxer” Enriquez says that Morgan was good for at least a dozen murders on his own and had engineered many more.
“All the members were expected to put in work,” says former gang investigator Valdemar. “They called it ‘putting in work’ or ‘wetting your steel.’ When I say work, I mean murder. If you hesitated, you fell from grace. Every one of them put in work and they were reluctant to pass on work to anyone else. The gang was basically a bunch of prolific murderers. Prisoners like Morgan knew the system. He let people like me run the overt system, but he ran the covert. Overtly, they were cooperative with us and knew we controlled the walls, but inwardly, they operated covertly and controlled the inside.
“He was in custody in the L.A. County Jail when I worked there,” Valdemar continues. “Like 1972-73. He was in my module, the high-power module, where all the big people from the Aryan Brotherhood, BGF, Mexican Mafia, and some political guys, like Black Panthers, were. I had direct contact with him on a regular basis. I also ran the law library which inmates were allowed to visit. He was very polite. He would greet me in Spanish. The guys at the top back then, they had a smooth, know-how-to-do-time kind of attitude, but they were dangerous.”
“La Eme seized control of the flow of narcotics into San Quentin,” says Niko Vorobyov, author of Dopeworld, a new book about the international drug trade. (See our interview with Vorobyov starting on page 104.) “And as gangmembers were transferred out, they did the same thing at other prisons. Joe Morgan had La Eme getting protection money from incarcerated Italian Mafia members, along with running all the prison hustles. More importantly, he started laying the foundation for the organization on the outside.”
Beginning in 1971, in another brazen La Eme initiative, recently paroled members of the gang began taking over federally funded drug and alcohol programs in East L.A. barrios, and some community action groups as well. The moves provided income fronts for ex-con gangbangers, always ready to do the gang’s bidding (strict, across-the-board obedience to the directives of La Eme shot callers was and is an ironclad rule, and the punishment for leaving the gang is death), as well as opportunities to siphon off government money. Gang revenue streams were expanding.
Over the years, as Valdemar’s career in law enforcement progressed, Joe Morgan’s name kept popping up in various investigations, but during most of this time, he remained in custody. In other words, Morgan was pulling strings from inside the belly of the beast, issuing directives, cementing La Eme power. This was a gang and a kingpin with reach.
One of the strategic moves Morgan helped guide was establishing the pact with the Aryan Brotherhood, known as the AB. “He was a liaison,” Valdemar remembers, before adding, “but the AB had a close relationship with all the Mexican Mafia members.”
Elaborating on Morgan’s personality and approach as a La Eme shot caller, Valdemar offers this: “I would say he’s one of those people that commanded your attention. If he was in the military, he would have been a leader. He wasn’t loud. He wasn’t boisterous. He didn’t try to inflict himself on anyone else. He just quietly took command.”
The Mexican Mafia has no official hierarchy. Unlike the sprawling Latin Kings gang, they don’t bestow titles and don’t elect “Coronas” to rule the organization. Mexican Mafia members rise to de facto leadership according to what’s needed at the time and who’s in power. It was law enforcement that labeled Morgan a godfather. But in truth, he was just a loyal member of La Eme who took charge to benefit the gang — and had the help of several equally powerful members who backed him. Morgan was a natural leader, so he took on a leadership role.
He knew his clout. He didn’t need an official title.
“To rise to the pinnacle of La Eme, as a güero no less, he must have been one smart, devious, bad motherfucker,” says Chris Kasparoza. “But also a loyal, charismatic one, with a code of honor. There was a reason why so many alpha-male murderers deferred to him, and even the cops tasked with locking him up were impressed. Morgan could get people to calm down. He was a diplomat in a certain sense.”
“His main allies,” says Al Profit, “were Ramon ‘Mundo’ Mendoza, Robert ‘Robot’ Salas, Alfred ‘Alfie’ Sosa, and Edward ‘Sailor Boy’ Gonzales. With these hard-core brothers, Morgan implemented La Eme’s decrees on the streets, which led to more power inside the prison system. During this part of the 1970s, the Mexican Mafia would become well-known all over California. All the Mexican street gangs paid tribute to La Eme. The organization’s name spread fear. Along with the brotherhood’s growth, of course, is the fact that law enforcement was getting hip to the gang and who their leaders were, in and out of prison.”
As his power grew, Morgan developed enemies and detractors within La Eme.
“Two OGs — Reymundo ‘Bevito’ Alvarez, who murdered a BGF shot caller, and Ernest ‘Kilroy’ Roybal — schemed against this rising soldado,” says Christian Cipollini. “They insisted that no one should be in La Eme who wasn’t Latino. They didn’t like Morgan, but Morgan had too much clout. He was paroled from Folsom in 1971, and when he hit the streets there were dozens of La Eme members on the outside as well. Morgan set about to try and organize the brothers into a cash-producing criminal enterprise.”
This Anglo shot caller wanted to “spread the Eme gospel.” Along with longtime friend Rodolfo Cadena, he launched a strategy of leveraging the organization’s power inside prison to control territory in the wider world.
Says Gangster Report’s Burnstein: “The ‘If you own the inside, you can own the outside’ philosophy grew La Eme to epic heights. Morgan’s contributions to the gang’s expansion were invaluable. Not only did his connections to narcotics suppliers catapult the Mexican Mafia into being instant, major players in the California dope game, his skills as a gangland politician paid dividends in the form of alliances and business relationships with other criminal factions — the Italian Mafia, Aryan Brotherhood, outlaw biker gangs.”
Morgan (top row, right) and other Mexican Mafia members at a funeral, San Francisco, 1976
Morgan came to the conclusion that a lot of La Eme members, when they hit the streets, were obsessed with settling old scores instead of benefitting the organization as a whole. He envisioned the gang getting into more profitable endeavors. He knew murder had its place, but he wanted to use violence to further La Eme’s ends instead of securing personal revenge. As early as 1973, California newspapers were identifying Morgan as the leader of the Mexican Mafia. He couldn’t stay out of prison, though. He was always going back on parole violations.
Then in 1975, out on parole, he was indicted on federal narcotics charges and fled to Utah. He remained on the loose until July of 1977 when he was captured, and a charge of trafficking firearms joined the drug charges and fugitive warrants. A year later, he was sent back to prison for being a felon in possession of a firearm and heroin possession.
“Morgan and other top La Eme members were part of a new generation of drug lords that didn’t answer to the Italian Mafia,” says Niko Vorobyov. “They made their own connects, getting heroin straight from the source. Before, the main smack track to the States ran through the Italians, who got it from French refineries and the Middle East. But as that route started drying up, it was time to look south of the border. Poppy’s been grown in the hills of Sinaloa in Mexico since the nineteenth century. And the connections that Morgan put together in prison allowed La Eme and their street affiliates to start moving Mexican black-tar heroin in the seventies.”
Morgan had ample heroin connections. He was known as a guy who could get weight. In time, a childhood friend hiding out in Mexico, Harry Gamboa Buckley, raised in the streets of Maravilla, introduced Morgan to Jesus “Chuy” Araujo, head of the Araujo drug cartel.
Shortly after Araujo became Morgan’s main supplier of heroin, Morgan let everyone in Southern California’s criminal underworld know that if they were in the dope business, they had to sell Mexican Mafia dope. Refuse to do so and you were hit. As in murdered.
“Morgan considered the gang’s financial condition the most important aspect, but other brothers didn’t share his opinion,” says Scott Burnstein. “With made members in every major southern city in California, Morgan knew that La Eme was sitting on a gold mine. Morgan envisioned La Eme being like the Italian Mafia.”
Morgan advocated for a situation where he and other Mexican Mafia leaders functioned as Carlo Gambino or Lucky Luciano types, calling the shots while the soldiers did the dirty work, and counting the money all the way to the bank.
In the late 1970s, gang hit man Mundo Mendoza, having embraced Christianity, became a government informant. Morgan had no idea that one of his trusted confidants was actively working against him, playing ball with law enforcement. Mendoza testified that Morgan was responsible for ordering multiple murders both inside prison and out on the street. He implicated Morgan in the murder of Robert Mrazek, a La Eme associate, who was shot to death in 1977. Prosecutors presented evidence that Mrazek’s wife Helen asked Joe Morgan to kill her husband. According to a 1993 Los Angeles Times article, the La Eme kingpin first asked Mendoza to do the hit (the paper called Mrazek a “suspected Seal Beach drug dealer”). Mendoza claimed Morgan supplied him with a photo of Mrazek, his house key, and a .45-caliber pistol stuffed in a brown paper bag.
Ultimately, the execution was handled by La Eme member Arthur Guzman, who, along with Morgan and Mrazek’s wife, were all sentenced to life in state prison.
The year was 1978. Joe Morgan would never see the streets again.
“I was housed on the same tier with Morgan at Folsom during the mid-1980s,” an individual known as Serious Steve tells Penthouse. “What immediately struck me was how the guards treated him with a civility and deference I had not encountered before in prison. Morgan had him some presence. He was a strongly built person a head taller than most of the other carnales and was cat-quick on the handball court. He was fluent in like four languages and could speak intelligently on most any subject. A charismatic, charming individual. And very intense, to say the least. When Joe Morgan spoke, everyone listened. I never heard anyone refer to him as Pegleg.”
Criminal turned writer/actor Edward Bunker also got to know Morgan at Folsom, though decades earlier, during Morgan’s first Folsom incarceration.
Bunker — who played “Mr. Blue” in Quentin Tarantino’s 1992 film Reservoir Dogs, and inspired the bank-robber character Nate, played by Jon Voight, in Michael Mann’s Heat — called Morgan the “toughest by far” of all the men he met during his 18 years in prison.
In his 2001 memoir, Education of a Felon, Bunker writes: “When I say ‘the toughest,’ I don’t necessarily mean he could beat up anyone in a fight. Joe only had one leg below the knee…. He was still pretty good with his fists, but his true toughness was inside his heart and brain. No matter what happened, Joe took it without a whimper and frequently managed to laugh.”
When the movie American Me was released March of 1992, it elevated La Eme’s national profile, not unlike the way Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather brought the Italian Mafia to the pop-culture forefront in the early seventies.
People who might have thought of La Eme as merely a violent California prison gang, if they were familiar with the Latino brotherhood at all, now saw it as bona fide criminal syndicate with reach and power.
However, members of this secretive organization, including Joe Morgan, were not at all happy with the movie’s fictionalized chronicle of their gang’s birth and ascent.
And this anger had director and star Edward James Olmos, who played Santana, a shot caller inspired by the iconic La Eme cofounder Rodolfo “Cheyenne” Cadena, fearing for his life, talking to the FBI, and seeking a permit to carry a concealed weapon.
“I want to show there’s a cancer in this subculture of gangs,” Olmos told the Los Angeles Times in 1991, addressing his reasons for making American Me. Hoping to demythologize the La Eme world so as to discourage disaffected young Mexican-American men from joining the gang, Olmos created a harsh portrait of gang existence, with scenes of abuse and extreme violence. But what got Morgan and his crew mad were other aspects of the movie. In American Me, the Santana character is raped by another youth in a juvenile facility, and later Santana is shown being impotent with a woman.
Moreover, older and wiser Santana is eventually killed by his gang brothers for having doubts about their bloody enterprise. But in real life, Cadena was murdered by members of the Nuestra Familia gang, La Eme’s bitter enemies. In a gruesome hit that set off rounds of prison payback murder, “Cheyenne” Cadena was shanked multiple times and thrown off a tier at Chino State Prison, only to be shanked again when he landed.
To members of La Eme, Olmos’s movie stained their honor.
And payback followed here, too. At least it sure looked like it did.
Within weeks of the movie’s release, two of its consultants were murdered execution-style. Just 12 days after the premier, a 53-year-old La Eme member who’d spoken to Olmos during his research interviews was gunned down by a pair of gang hit men in the Ramona Gardens projects in Boyle Heights, a La Eme stronghold.
Then in May, 49-year-old gang-intervention counselor Ana Lizaragga, a paid technical adviser with a small part in the movie, was slain by a pair of ski-masked hit men in her Boyle Heights driveway, shot in front of her boyfriend as they packed up their van for a trip. One of the assassins, a La Eme prospect, had just been paroled from Folsom.
In August of the following year, another unpaid consultant to the film was slain in his car. A member of a local La Eme affiliate gang was sent to prison for that hit.
Law enforcement pointed out that all three victims had displeased La Eme for reasons other than cooperating with the movie, and so were careful about calling the executions “payback.” Lizaragga, for example, who’d lost her own husband and two nephews in gang shootings, was suspected of being a snitch. But the timing of those first two hits, especially, is hard to ignore. A Chino prison official told the Los Angeles Times that the killings were meant as a message for Olmos. He also received veiled threats from gangmembers.
“When they made American Me,” says Richard Valdemar, “they actually approached Joe Morgan and supposedly got unofficial permission to make the movie as long as he hired Mexican Mafia advisors. And Olmos did in fact do that. But that meant he put himself under the rules of the Mexican Mafia.”
A month after the movie opened, Morgan filed a lawsuit seeking $500K in punitive damages from Olmos, Universal Studios, and others connected to the film. Morgan contended that filmmakers didn’t have permission to use his story and likeness in creating the J.D. character, an Anglo gangmember from East L.A., fluent in Spanish, with a shaved head and prosthetic leg. The case was eventually dismissed. But ever since the ordeal faced by Olmos (who made the cover of Time in 1988 for his Stand and Deliver stardom), Hollywood has been understandably leery about new Mexican Mafia projects.
Joe Morgan died of liver cancer in November 1993, in a hospital ward at Corcoran State Prison, where he’d been transferred from Pelican Bay State Prison, having spent his final months and years confined in an 8-by-10 cell 22-and-a-half hours every day.
He was 64, and left behind a wife, Jody, and two children.
In his 2012 memoir Mexican Mafia: The Gang of Gangs, Ramon Mendoza describes Morgan as the “coldest, most calculating, and brutal son of a bitch you could ever encounter.” But he was also, Mendoza adds, the “funniest, most compassionate, and witty person one could ever hope to know.”
This complicated, one-of-a-kind prison gangster, who went hard and was instrumental in turning the Mexican Mafia into a dominant American gang, carries a legendary charge in the annals of organized crime. Part of Morgan’s legacy is still very much alive — La Eme continues to control the great majority of Latino gangs in Southern California, and has affiliate tentacles all over the country. A vast network of Sureños — Mexican Mafia foot soldiers — remain ready to do the bidding of their prison shot callers.
As for the movie Morgan helped inspire, retired gang investigator Richard Valdemar remembers something else that happened during the tense weeks after its release.
Concerned about the murders of Olmos’s East L.A. gang consultants, William Forsythe, who played J.D., called up Valdemar and said, “Hey, am I in trouble?”
Valdemar replied, “No, they love you. They think you’ve played him to perfection, so you’re not in trouble.” Valdemar himself thinks Forsythe did an excellent job.
“In fact,” Valdemar says, “the scene where he’s walking into court with the leather jacket on, if I didn’t know that was the actor, I would have thought that was Joe Morgan.”
It was the boldest move in cinema history: presenting the most celebrated and respected actors of the day in a film that could only be described as pornographic. Bob Guccione, founder of this magazine, set his sights on decimating the boundaries between art, sex, and cinema and succeeded to such a potent degree that even 40 years later, no theatrical event has come close to matching the scope and scandal of Caligula.
Writer Gore Vidal was one of the most distinguished literary minds of his time; his daring 1964 novel Julian famously compared the decadence of modern society to fourth-century Rome, making him a logical choice for producer Franco Rossellini to bring on board to script Caligula. Vidal, rooted in the reputable culture surrounding a best-selling author, described his script as “an analysis of how power corrupts,” and envisioned Caligula as a historically accurate, visually traditional, and wholly serious film documenting the actions of the most debauched and sadistic ruler in history.
Guccione, while complimenting Vidal as an “intellectual colossus” and “formidable historian,” wanted to push the boundaries of cinema, and after agreeing to join the production as financier and producer, hired critically acclaimed auteur of avant-garde cinema Tinto Brass as director. Aligned with Guccione, Brass imagined the film as a bombastic satire on the corrupting influence of power, retooling the script to emphasize the complicity of the senate and bringing on board Academy Award-winning set designer Danilo Donati to construct grand, expansive sets suggesting the excess and flamboyance of the Roman Empire.
At various points, Mick Jagger and Jack Nicholson were rumored to be in the running for the titular role. But the dubious honor of portraying one of the most nefarious men in history ultimately went to Malcolm McDowell, a young English actor riding high in Hollywood from his landmark role as the amoral lead in Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange. Teresa Ann Savoy, who had starred in Tinto Brass’s previous film, Salon Kitty, portrayed Caligula’s sister. The cast also included John Steiner as the cunning and ambitious advisor Longinus, and three British acting icons: Helen Mirren as Caligula’s promiscuous wife, Caesonia; Sir John Gielgud as Nerva, the wise and impertinent imperial counselor; and Peter O’Toole as syphilitic Emperor Tiberius.
From sets to costuming, no expense was spared in the extravagant production, but the differences between Caligula and a traditional epic film were immediately noticeable. In addition to the presence of a curated collection of exotic Penthouse Pets on-screen, McDowell remembered: “I’d look over and there would be two dwarves and an amputee dancing around some girls splayed out on a giant dildo.” When the very respectable Sir Gielgud arrived on set, O’Toole prodded, “Hello, Johnny! What’s a knight of the realm doing in a porno film?”
Helen Mirren recalled naked bodies everywhere, expressing that the experience of making Caligula “was like showing up for a nudist camp every day. You felt embarrassed if you had your clothes on in that movie.” She cheekily added, “It was like being sent down to Dante’s Inferno.”
With production underway, the budget quickly ballooned to twice that of Star Wars, and Guccione later complained that enough footage was shot to “make the original version of Ben-Hur about 50 times over.” Filming was rife with conflict: Vidal and Brass butted heads constantly, leading to the director banning Vidal from the set; and a spiteful Donati got a jab in by building the major set piece of Caligula’s pleasure ship at such an enormous scale that it filled the entire production studio, ensuring that the massive creation was nearly unfilmable and limiting the furious director considerably.
The mighty triumvirate of Vidal, Brass, and Guccione was a marketing dream come true: three titans in their respective fields, united for a creation unlike anything seen before on the cultural landscape–certainly unique in film history. Caligula, however, would end with two of the three creators forcibly distancing themselves from the finished film.
As soon as filming was completed, Brass was unceremoniously fired, and it was revealed that Guccione had been shooting hard-core pornographic scenes on the multimillion-dollar sets at night with the intention of overseeing completion of the movie himself. The end result was a curiously edited version of the film — heavy on spectacle, light on continuity. Brass was understandably devastated, and sued to have his name removed as director of a film so far afield from his vision.
Vidal was likewise infuriated by the developments surrounding Caligula, and also sued to have his credit removed. “My name is being used to give prestige to a pornographic film which could be denounced for obscenity,” he complained, adding that “‘Caligula’ is Latin for ‘turkey.’”
In the end, the film’s script was credited as being “adapted from a screenplay by Gore Vidal,” and Brass’s credit was changed to “principal photography by.” Only Guccione stood by the finished product, placing his name above the title as “Bob Guccione presents” and crediting himself with “additional scenes by.” Guccione oversaw a series of editors on the movie, with no one accepting final responsibility; in the end, the film bore the simple credit of “edited by the production.”
The finished version of Caligula premiered in the U.S. on February 15, 1980. Critics immediately picked up on the troubled production. Roger Ebert called it “worthless,” yet admitted that as he exited the theater, hundreds of people were lined up, waiting to see the film. Even with the $7.50 ticket price (double the cost of a regular movie ticket), attendance was so high and screenings so frequent that the film reels quickly needed to be replaced from wear. “History is filled with their nameless gravestones,” Guccione said of the critics, “while the names of the men and women they spent their lives attacking live on.”
Malcolm McDowell, for his part, stands behind his performance in the film, commenting, “I’m proud of the work I did in Caligula. There’s no question about that.” But he also says the Guccione-edited release was “an absolutely outrageous betrayal and quite unprecedented.”
Caligula has anchored one of the most enduring speculative discussions in cinematic history: What could the film have been if completed by other hands? Now, a monumental development will provide an answer to this long-standing question about a different final shape for this controversial creation. For the film’s 40th anniversary, Penthouse has opened the vaults containing the original camera negatives — long believed to have been lost — and a new edit conforming to Gore Vidal’s script is being produced by author and filmmaker Thomas Negovan and director E. Elias Merhige.
This new 40th anniversary version, titled Caligula MMXX, is Penthouse’s first feature-film production since the original Caligula premiered, and will be unveiled in a limited theatrical release in the fall of 2020.
“The story of Penthouse’s Caligula is legendary,” says Negovan. “It occupies a unique place in movie history as being widely considered both the worst film in history and also very possibly the finest film never completed. Of course the opportunity to help bring into the world what we’ve all imagined this film could be was a priceless honor. The immaculate footage we’ve uncovered confirms McDowell’s statement of pride: scene after scene reveals an incredibly dedicated and gripping performance.
“With 96 hours of footage and so many disparate opinions clashing and boiling over during the actual filming process,” Negovan continues, “this isn’t just a film restoration project, it’s an archeological dig. It’s been thrilling beyond words to see so many scenes that had long been thought lost forever — hours and hours of absolutely magical performances by Helen Mirren, Sir John Gielgud, Peter O’Toole, and John Steiner, all unseen since they were performed on set over four decades ago. This resurrection of a lost masterpiece will be the most important film event of the year.”
It’s a thrilling turn of events, this new life for a boundary-breaking, fiercely debated film. Stay tuned for more information on its autumn debut.
Malcolm McDowell speaks with Bob Guccione on set.
The Penthouse Caligula Coin
Malcolm McDowell and Helen Mirren
Director Tinto Brass (left) with Bob Guccione on set.
Helen Mirren behind the scenes.
Malcolm McDowell, Peter O’Toole, and John Gielgud on break.
Malcolm McDowell as Caligula
Sign up for news and updates on “Caligula MMXX” at caligulammxx.
From the ancient Greeks’ use of poppy juice to the Napoleonic armies bringing hashish back to Europe from Egypt, soldiers have been getting fucked up for a long, long time.
Sometimes the drugs (and drinks) were meant to boost ferocity — the colonial British navy and their “Dutch courage” of rum, say, or the Nazis’ pioneering use of amphetamines. A drugs-and-combat overlap can also be found in the British powers slipping dashes of cocaine into their Tommies’ rum portions during World War I, and the deployment of child soldiers high on drugs in Sierra Leone at the turn of our own century.
Self-medicating has played its own understandable role, with soldiers in war and wounded or traumatized veterans back home turning to drugs or alcohol when their prescriptions, treatment, and surgeries have proved lacking. The stress and physical damage of war have always pushed soldiers and ex-soldiers to find ways of soothing mind and body.
On the other end of the spectrum from substances meant to calm and relieve pain are stimulants intended to raise vigilance and ward off fatigue. Think of the American pilots during the Cold War monitoring the skies wired on “pep pills,” otherwise known as speed. Or the legions of Americans who have fought the twenty-first-century terror wars swearing by legal and illegal energy drinks — caffeine-laced Rip It, Boom Boom, and Wild Tiger, a Middle Eastern product, among the legit favorites.
Patrolling Iraqi highways for 40 hours at a time, hopped up on liquid nicotine, may not be as flashy as stories of whiskey ragers in trenches or heroin binges in the jungle, but the short-term effects were still interesting. And now there’s concern about the long term: A recent study suggests a link between excessive energy-drink use in combat zones and post-traumatic stress.
As for marijuana — aka weed, dope, reefer, pot, Mary Jane, ganja, and the list goes on — it’s woven into firsthand accounts of the Vietnam War. On the pop-culture front, the drug makes an especially vivid appearance in Oliver Stone’s acclaimed 1986 feature film Platoon.
When Charlie Sheen’s Chris Taylor, newly arrived in-country, enters the haze-filled “underworld” tent and parties with experienced soldiers, he (and we, the viewers) accepts weed-smoking as the norm for American soldiers in ’Nam. And the scene is not without justification. According to author Lukasz Kamienski’s Shooting Up: A Short History of Drugs and War, nearly 70 percent of American servicemembers reported using marijuana during their time in Vietnam (with a striking 34 percent reporting heroin use).
Fifty years after this Southeast Asia conflict, active-duty soldiers and servicemembers aren’t similarly blazing up — at least not in such mass numbers. Even if the collective urge to partake was the same, advancements in drug screenings, and the military’s steady use of those screenings, would make it impossible.
But it’s a different story when it comes to post-service veterans, particularly younger ones.
According to the nonprofit Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA), one in five of its members reported using medical marijuana. And over 80 percent of IAVA members support the legalization of cannabis for healthcare purposes, suggesting a big generational shift in the acceptance of marijuana being used as treatment.
Much like American society itself, the Department of Veterans Affairs finds itself in a tricky position with regard to marijuana. According to Pacific Standard magazine, “VA doctors are allowed to discuss cannabis use with veterans and tailor VA-prescribed medications to their cannabis use, but they cannot recommend or direct a veteran’s use of cannabis.”
They can’t even do this in states where cannabis is legal, because the VA has to follow federal law. So until Uncle Sam changes, the VA can’t join this widespread evolution in attitudes toward marijuana use.
One of the soldiers from my old scout platoon knows all about this bind. Thirty-two-year-old Philippe Dumè of Trenton, New Jersey, put it this way in an email:
“As a combat veteran on medicinal marijuana, it’s still somewhat of an obstacle where and if I want to use my medical marijuana card…. In the VA, there’s no such program [for this], because cannabis is still considered a Schedule I drug. In my opinion, I think that cannabis should be considered as an alternative medicine in the VA. It really does help out with the side effects.”
Dumè proved himself worthy in combat — trust me, I was there — as an able and devoted infantryman. (Longtime readers may know him better as Specialist Haitian Sensation from the Kaboom days.) Now he’s proving himself worthy as a veterans’ advocate. Dumè is part of an advocacy group called Black Cannabis that “seeks to provide opportunity for those who have been unrepresented in the legal cannabis industry” — specifically minorities, women, LGBTQ, and felons.
Until I talked with Dumè about Black Cannabis, I hadn’t really given much thought to how quickly legal marijuana has become corporatized, or how access to it predictably benefits the already privileged. So I’m proud of him and how he’s using his combat bona fides here, because, as his organization says, “For generations the War on Drugs has devastated communities of color.”
That’s unequivocally true. And for these communities to get a piece of the weed-business pie seems not only right, but fundamental to American values and progress. This is the land of opportunity, after all.
Dumè is part of a new generation of military veterans, one that’s not hiding away their war demons from the rest of society. It’s a generation that’s not ashamed to say, “Hey, this stuff helps and I don’t care who knows it.” And America’s recognizing that.
One California-based cannabis company, Flower Co., offers a steep discount for military veterans, which cracks me up. It’s smart business and allows the company to wave the flag and support the troops. America’s gonna America, one way or another, I guess.
Now it’s high time (sorry, couldn’t help myself) for the federal government to catch up with its citizens and the private sector. Until it does, vets like Dumè and his colleagues in Black Cannabis will have to man the gap.
Driven to get a deeper understanding of the global narcotics scene, Niko Vorobyov hit 15 countries on five continents, talking to everyone from a Japanese yakuza hit man to cartel leaders in Mexico and Columbia. A former drug dealer himself, Vorobyov chronicles his journeys in an epic new book, Dopeworld: Adventures in Drug Lands.
It’s immersive journalism at its best, giving readers a ride-along as the Russian-born, London-raised writer meets cocaine farmers, heroin cooks, crack-era kingpins, drug-war crusaders, Iranian opium smokers, Moroccan hash makers, and Brazilian gangsters. Vorobyov has an insider’s grasp of the international drug game, and made use of contacts from his dealing days to gain entry to secretive, sometimes dangerous criminal worlds.
The book’s sweep includes a history of humanity’s relationship with psychoactive substances, and a look at issues like prohibition regimes, law-enforcement approaches, legalization, and the nexus between organized crime and drug distribution.
A drug user when he was young, Vorobyov began selling weed, coke, and MDMA in London, eventually moving kilos of drugs in an enterprise that included two assistants and a network of suppliers. At one point he got stabbed, and nearly bled to death. Busted in 2013, he was sent to jail and served two and a half years.
Prison fucked with his head. Vorobyov paced inside his cell, working out, down to the minute, how long he’d be locked up. Desperate for distraction, he binged at the prison library, which is where he discovered Mr. Nice, a memoir by drug smuggler Howard Marks, and Ioan Grillo’s El Narco, which exposed the way drug gangs threaten the very stability of Mexico.
Inspired by these and other accounts of the drug underworld, Vorobyov, once he had his freedom back, started down the path that would, years later, result in Dopeworld.
Penthouse sat down with the witty, engaging author and asked him about his journeys, prison time, the drug war, legalization, and what it’s like to hang with hit men.
What made you want to write this book?
I wanted to shine a light on a dark world that’s all around us. To do that, I wrote something that mixes genres. It’s a social-political-historical book, but it’s also got a layer of gonzo reporting, like Hunter S. Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. I met El Chapo’s family, smoked hash with the police in Iran, and took part in an ayahuasca ritual in the depths of the Peruvian Amazon. It’s also kind of a fucked-up travel book, the sort of thing that, when it’s on sale at airport stores, could scare the shit out of people flying to Mexico.
Why would someone with your drug-dealing background want legalization?
It depends on what you mean by legalize. Do I think heroin should be sold in supermarkets? No. I mean, obviously, I wasn’t exactly thrilled about being locked away for dealing, but I’ve tried to educate myself about the drug problem and see other points of view. I’ve been to countries like the Philippines and Iran where they hang drug dealers or just shoot them on the spot. And guess what? There are still drugs in the Philippines and Iran, but the people who actually do have a drug problem are too scared to come forward and do anything about it because they’re afraid of getting killed, arrested, or shunned.
I think prohibition, globally and historically, has failed, and we need to start looking at other options. Legalization of at least some drugs — like ecstasy or shrooms — should be on the table.
How does the war on drugs vary, or not vary, around the world?
In every country there’s a lot of bad science and propaganda about what drugs actually do. And it’s always us against them — either minorities get targeted by the drug war, or the poor. Me and my team were out dining near a slum part of Manila one night and somebody got killed just outside our restaurant as we were eating. They drove up on a motorbike and popped two caps in a guy’s head.
That was the first time I’d seen someone’s brains where they’re not supposed to be. They have a president there, Rodrigo Duterte, who’s a psycho and just wants to kill all addicts and dealers. Since 2016, there’s been something like 26,000 killed, either from police murders or vigilante death squads. That’s basically a genocide. They say they’re going after drug kingpins, but really it’s just the poor getting fucked in the ass.
There’s a chapter about drugs in the Middle East. What did you learn?
I thought it would be interesting to see how these ultra-conservative, religious Middle Eastern societies deal with the problem of drugs. I’d heard a story about the Alaei brothers — two doctors in Iran — who were imprisoned for helping their addicted patients. I got in touch with one of them and found that in the nineties they set up a free clinic for drug users, sex workers, and HIV sufferers. Iran’s the first stop on the smack track from Afghanistan and it is traditional to smoke opium there, so there was a lot of heroin about. But the government doesn’t want to admit this happens. They want everyone to think their citizens are good, pious Muslims.
A clinic like the one the Alaei brothers opened meant not everyone was acting entirely in-line with scripture. In 2008, they were accused of “spying” and thrown into Tehran’s notorious Evin prison. But even there they continued their work, setting up health programs for prisoners, and even a weekly newspaper. Finally in 2010-2011, they were freed after an international outcry and now live in exile, teaching online classes to medical students in Syria.
What are your thoughts on Portugal’s decriminalization of drugs?
The police in Portugal don’t care if you’re carrying a gram in your pocket. It’s an administrative offense, like a parking ticket, so if you’re a kid smoking pot you won’t get a record that follows you the rest of your life. Not only that, but the Portuguese government poured money into free treatment and harm reduction, like handing out clean needles and teaching people how to take drugs safely. And it’s been extraordinarily effective. They’re not locking people up in the millions and they have the lowest overdose rate in Europe.
I wonder how far that would get in the States before everyone freaked out about “handouts.” I think what they’ve done in Portugal is great but they haven’t gone far enough. There’s still a hard core of addicts. Also, dealing — coke, weed, etc. — is still illegal. My good buddy Mario’s a Lisbon club promoter but I haven’t heard from him in a while — maybe cops got him.
What have you concluded about America’s opioid crisis?
You could argue that the crisis is an example of why we shouldn’t legalize anything. You’ve got Big Pharma — supposedly trusted doctors and drug companies — giving people highly addictive drugs, all above-board. And it’s caused a higher death toll than the Vietnam War did. The opioid crisis is complicated, but a lot of people I talked to were led to heroin by prescription drugs, and then either lost their prescription or couldn’t afford it. They don’t have that problem in Switzerland and other countries where you can go to a clinic and shoot up diamorphine for free. So it seems to me the problem is still black-market smack being taken illegally.
What’s the drug situation in Russia, where you were born?
Heroin used to be the big thing. In the nineties, my friends used to hustle and steal every day just to score a bag of dope from the gypsy village. Now everything’s gone online, on the dark web, but unlike in the West, it’s tricky to get drugs delivered straight to your house. Instead, once you send the money, you’ll get the GPS coordinates where to find the goods, along with some photos of where they are stashed. For instance, it’ll be under such-and-such a tree, when you take the first left in the park. It’s like a little quest or scavenger hunt.
What’s prison like in Britain?
My prison was called HMP Isis, so you could say I was in Isis before joining Isis became a thing. There’s some people out there who say prison is like a holiday camp, but I think they’ve just been booking the wrong holidays. I’ve gotta say there is violence, there are drugs, there are gangs, but mostly it’s just boring and depressing.
Every time you watch a movie or a TV show about prison they gotta make it more exciting than it actually is. I mean, I can’t speak for women’s prisons in America, but on shows like Orange is the New Black they have way too much freedom — like they can walk around and go get finger-banged in the chapel whenever they wanted.
It’s also a very stressful environment. There’s a sense that this is it — you’re fucked now. No one’s coming to get you. When you and me get stressed, we can go outside, take a walk, talk with our friends. But when you’re in prison, you’re stuck alone in a tiny cell till they let you out, and you start going crazy. When I was inside, there were so many cutbacks they didn’t have enough staff to run the show properly, so sometimes we’d be locked up 23.5 hours a day. Suicides were sky-high that year.
How’d your encounter with a yakuza hit man go?
The yakuza are the Japanese mafia, and between cutting off fingers and full-body tattoos, they also handle the drug business. In Japan, that usually means crystal meth. It’s hard for me to verify what he was saying and one thing I learned quickly in jail is people talk a lot of shit. But based on what I’d seen and read about the Japanese underworld over the years, there were enough details to make it sound plausible. He was a Spanish Filipino whose father abused him horribly, and he grew up with a lot of anger and was always getting in fights until finally he met some people who could exploit his anger.
Japan’s a very safe country but the stories he was telling me were like an ultraviolent Takashi Miike movie. He told me about one time his crew went robbing a group of immigrant dealers. No one heard from them again, and he still has nightmares about chopping up bodies. In another life — if you added an unhealthy obsession with his mom — this guy might have been a serial killer, but it shows how organized crime takes those same instincts and unleashes them for a profit.
When you began your journeys, were you already envisioning this book?
It started out as letters to the outside while I was in prison. People thought it was funny when I wrote to complain about having no rights and shit. For example, the prison admin wouldn’t accept that I changed my religion to “Jedi.” When I got out, I started doing a few articles and slowly got the idea to write a full-length book. So I started booking flights to faraway places and taking notes on what I saw. But I didn’t really have any idea of what I was doing, not even a title, until I hooked up with the same agent as Howard Marks. That’s when the mess of my thoughts started coming together into something people could actually read, and the rest is history.
What did you learn about the American criminal justice system?
One of the kingpins I talked to was Freeway Ricky Ross. If you wanted some crack in the eighties in L.A., he was the man to call, and he ended up getting a life sentence — one that was later reduced. But listening to him talk, the ’hood was already a fucked-up place when he was growing up. Who’s more to blame — Ross seizing the best financial opportunity available to a teenager who couldn’t read in South Central, or the system that produces thousands like him?
It’s a vicious cycle. You’ve got successive generations of politicians, from the hard-right Reagan to the supposedly liberal Clinton, putting every other black man in prison — many for nonviolent crimes — and then we wonder why the inner city’s so fucked up. And of course African-Americans have already been done dirty by slavery and Jim Crow, and the prison-industrial complex is just a continuation of that.
Along with all your field reporting, did you do other kinds of research?
Ever since I was in prison I’ve been hitting the books hard — maybe too hard! I’ve probably read every major book on drugs or drug trafficking there is. The books that most inspired me are Johann Hari’s Chasing the Scream, about the war on drugs all over the world, El Narco, a history of Mexican narco-trafficking, and McMafia, Misha Glenny’s book about global criminal syndicates.
I also had to sample a lot of wares — all in the name of science, of course.
Talk about how the drug war in the U.S. evolved.
The driving force behind marijuana being banned in the 1930s had to do with one man: Harry Anslinger, the first commissioner of a federal narcotics bureau under Hoover and a few presidents afterward. This was just after Prohibition ended — the alcohol prohibition — so Anslinger and his bunch of narcs had nothing left to do. So rather than sit around with their dicks in their hands waiting to get redundant, they went out and created new jobs through a lot of fearmongering. They basically said smoking weed would make you kill your whole family. And there was racism — you had a lot of black jazz musicians who were smoking “reefer,” and you also had Mexicans who were smoking “marijuana” — that’s partly why in America they say marijuana instead of cannabis, because it sounds more Mexican.
Which also means, interestingly, there was a period in twenties America when smoking weed was legal, but you weren’t allowed to get a beer. Harry was a racist and he’d treat white people with an addiction different to black people. He died in the seventies but his spirit lived on. We saw the pattern again in the eighties with the so-called crack epidemic — this picture of “crackheads” showing up to steal things every night, “crack mothers” and their babies, etc.
These were real problems but the way it got spun by the media and Ronald Reagan led to militarized police and mass incarceration on a scale never seen before. In no other developed country do police shoot so many unarmed civilians, and no other country in the world locks up so many of its own citizens. The cure was worse than the disease.
What do you want people to come away with after reading your book?
Well, some people say quitting cigarettes is even harder than coming off heroin, yet we say using one of these is evil and scummy and the other’s just a bad habit. Why? Is it really because heroin makes you go out and steal things and get infected with AIDS, or is it just the way our society treats drug addicts? Why’s it okay to go out, get drunk, and have a fight on Saturday night, but if you wanna stay home and smoke a joint, the guy you got it from has to go to prison?
We’ve been so programmed for decades. I want readers to think about whether there can be another way. But in writing Dopeworld, I didn’t want to make it preachy, or all facts, facts, facts. I wanted it to be a little bit funny, a little shocking or out there. You don’t always wanna read a PhD thesis, you wanna be entertained! So hopefully I’ve done that.
What’s next for you?
Move to an island in the Bahamas, get some strippers and beer, and party like it’s 1969! No, what I’m hoping to do is to make Dopeworld a sort of franchise. So we’ve got a Dutch edition coming up with an exclusive chapter about the gangster world of Amsterdam — “Gangsterdam,” we’re calling it. I’m hoping to sell the rights to more countries and write exclusive chapters for these places. For example: Hamas versus the opioid addiction problem on the Gaza Strip, for Arab-Hebrew editions. I’ve also got another idea for a book I’ve been working on called How to Break Out of Jail, with different prison-break stories from around the world.
Screenshot from the dark web … not in English
Locally branded cocaine in Brazil
Cannabis legalization protests in Portugal
Homemade “shabu” (methamphetamine) in Manila, Philippines
A statue of Malverde, the unofficial patron saint of drug traffickers
A Russian gangster graveyard
A member of the Yakuza
Seth Ferranti is a former federal prisoner whose writings have been featured on VICE, Don Diva, and Gorilla Convict. He’s author of the crime series Street Legends, the comic series Crime Comix, and writer/producer of “White Boy” on Starz. … You can find Dopeworld at Amazon to expand your knowledge.
There was a long chunk of time in the late 1800s where it was perfectly acceptable in polite society to do as much cocaine as you could handle. Thomas Edison, Ulysses S. Grant, Sigmund Freud, and William Halsted, the father of modern medicine, all sang the praises of cocaine in the heady early days after its discovery. Back then, mass-market brands sold wine fortified with cocaine, cocaine tea, even cocaine-laced margarine. Rich capitalists consumed it for pleasure, then handed it out to their employees to increase production.
Since nobody had any idea how cocaine toxicity works, and barely any conception of addiction other than as a spiritual failure, no one thought this could possibly be a bad thing until habitual users like Halsted and Freud started developing debilitating addictions, by which time cocaine abuse was epidemic within poor American communities. When Congress passed America’s first drug laws in 1914, cocaine had done enough damage that its effects are still being felt a century later.
Since the mid-1990s, we’ve been acting just like those naive Belle Epoque cokeheads with another enthralling miracle: the internet. We’ve been gorging on it, seeking out even more places–phones, cars, kitchen appliances–where we can cram it in, like the crazed addicts we are, refusing to believe that a tomorrow will ever come.
Only it’s becoming hard not to notice dawn starting to rise on our digital binge. Looking up from our phones, we’re realizing we’re more strung out than we’d like to admit. Internet addiction has made it into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the bible of mental illness, and digital rehab clinics are popping up around the country. Like those Americans a hundred years ago, we are waking up to the fact that this problem isn’t going to simply fix itself, and are finally taking steps to address it.
But it’s worth noting that as bad as America’s first cocaine epidemic was, it doesn’t compare to how bad things got on the other end of the twentieth century, when crack unleashed in America’s cities an unstoppable tsunami of desperate addiction and militarized violence that no one was prepared for. So what’s going to happen when somebody eventually invents something that makes our current internet binge seem tame by comparison– something capable of causing major mental, Internet addiction is a real thing, and it’s only getting worse. The question now is, what are we going to do about it? DIGITAL CRACK emotional, financial, or even physical damage to millions of people at a time?
What’s going to happen when someone figures out how to make digital crack?
I spent the fall of 2017 completely engrossed in the dumbest videogame I’ve ever played. AdVenture Capitalist has only the barest minimum of story line and mechanics to qualify as a game. Graphically, there’s not much more than a bunch of rapidly moving progress bars, and there’s zero attempt at emotional connection. The point of the game is to earn virtual money by buying and operating virtual businesses, all of which you do by pressing a few buttons. Then you spend your loot via buttons that push themselves, and from there all you have to do is enjoy the feeling of watching your dollars multiply from mere billions and trillions to ridiculous, cosmological denominations such as novemdecillions and vigintillions.
It may seem unsophisticated and straightup stupid, but AdVenture Capitalist is incredibly well-designed for what it’s meant to do, which is to create and then satisfy a compulsion to make “money,” and then use your undivided attention to sell you ads. It’s not fun, but it’s still pleasurable: the joy of smoothly functioning routine, the warm fuzzy feeling of acquisition.
I was in desperate need of a habit like that. I was in the midst of a brutal divorce, alone and isolated and suddenly without my usual coping mechanisms, since I’d just made the decision to get sober after admitting that my relationships with booze, benzos, and coke weren’t as healthy as I’d insisted. AdCap, as it calls itself, wasn’t as good as Xanax, but it was better than nothing. I’d check in on my mounting digital wealth a few times an hour, in between Netflix binges and compulsive Tinderswiping.
Since the early days of the drug revolution, sci-fi writers and futurists have predicted that technology would one day give us the kind of altered states of consciousness that until now we’ve relied on chemicals to produce. In the sixties, Philip K. Dick imagined a future where tabletop “mood organs” would let us dial-in our desired emotional states with an accuracy that psychopharmaceuticals could only wish for. And as soon as virtual reality had taken its first baby steps, technoutopians began promising that computergenerated trips as potent as chemically generated ones were just around the corner.
I existed in a blue-lit cocoon of digital indulgence, still spending my days jabbing at my brain’s pleasure centers with whatever was within reach, still every bit the addict, just with a new habit.
Tech-based drugs were supposed to be some kind of miracle–a quintessentially American dream of altered consciousness without the risks or worldly impurity of physical substances. So far they’ve been a disappointment. Decades after we were promised virtual acid trips, the closest thing we have is the VR experience recently unveiled at the Tribeca Film Festival that attempts to give you the sensation of an ayahuasca trip by dropping you inside what looks like Tool album art reimagined as a 3-D animated screensaver. If you Google “digital drugs,” you’ll mostly see articles related to “binaural beats,” which are audio files that supposedly get you high purely through sound, yet are considerably less effective than spinning around fast three or four times.
The high that our smartphones, videogames, and constant internet connections give us isn’t, on its surface, very powerful, or very good. Picking up your smartphone isn’t like doing a line of coke, but it’s effective at what it does. The steady cycle of anticipation and reward, serotonin and dopamine, punctuated periodically by a surge of adrenaline whenever you beat a tricky level, win an auction, or read a tweet that you either strongly agree with or strongly disagree with, can numb you to pretty much anything happening beyond your phone’s bezel that you wish wasn’t happening, whether it’s a boring wait in line at the bank or the crushing feeling of existential failure. (The rise of both incel hikikomori shut-ins and videogame addiction seem to be two sides of the same coin.)
That buzz is only going to get stronger, if not necessarily better. It’s a law of human nature that once we find something that gets us high, sooner or later someone will figure out how to make it more powerful, more habit-forming, and almost invariably more toxic. It was dark ingenuity that drove us to discover how to distill spirits from wine and transform Sudafed into methamphetamine. It’s the reason why so many people are quitting weed these days because they can’t handle how high it gets them, and why you can’t buy any pills or powders now without worrying about them being laced with fentanyl. We will always push things as far as they will go, and then invent new ways to push them even farther.
There is no reason to assume that technology will be any different. At some point, probably in the near future, someone will invent some sort of killer app that will make the weak, jaggy buzz of our current state of digital addiction seem like allergy medicine compared to crystal meth.
When we think about digital addiction, we usually think about family members who can’t stay off Facebook or how hard it is to put Instagram down once you start scrolling. But we’re still in the Stone Age as far as what we can do with engineering digital highs and habits. There’s an entire field of study devoted to designing compulsive behavior so new and fastmoving that its definitive text, Nir Eyal’s Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products, published in 2014, is already starting to feel out-of-date. (Eyal’s new book, Indistractable: How to Control Your Attention and Choose Your Life, is about how to resist the techniques he helped popularize.)
We’ve already discovered myriad ways to get people hooked on virtual things. Multiplayer videogames offer immersive hi-def escapism. Social media lets us mainline two of the strongest motivators of human behavior: social approval and envy. Candy Crush and Fruit Ninja give us little more than bright colors and mindless swiping and are almost disturbingly hard to put down, while Tinder and Grindr take bright colors and mindless swiping and add the very real chance of getting laid. These are all things that make digital life so miraculous, so captivating, even when it’s not being engineered to exploit our habitforming tendencies. It’s exciting and colorful entertainment, available at the push of a button. It’s the feeling that we can connect to anyone in the world from anywhere in the world. It’s an endless source of stimulation that we’re invited to indulge in as much as we can handle, and then some.
But we’re learning–and app designers are also learning–that those miraculous little feelings aren’t necessary. The trend in manufactured addiction right now is for minimalist, brutally efficient products that deliver the pleasure jolt from habitual behavior, but with a bare minimum of moving parts. TikTok has streamlined the entire concept of entertainment down to a firehose of context-free audiovisual stimulation straight to the neocortex that barely acknowledges concepts like character or narrative, but is terrifyingly easy to find yourself watching for the length of an episode of prestige television.
AdVenture Capitalist is only one of a growing field of “idle games” that not only barely hide their goal of dominating your attention in order to serve you ads, but weave jokes about it into their rudimentary gameplay. You don’t need anything sophisticated or particularly exciting from a technical standpoint–like VR or brainstimulating implants or anything else that could have sprung from a Y2K-era cyberpunk novel–when the mere promise of upgrading to a virtual pizza-delivery business is enough to keep you plugged in for hours at a time.
There are plenty of ways that our digital addiction could easily get a lot more harmful than just wasting our time and attention. If you look at the widespread decriminalization of gambling that’s sweeping the country, then look at tech’s current obsession with “micropayments” designed to reduce digital spending to an almost subconscious level, then spend an entire train ride next to someone compulsively slashing through Fruit Ninja, you might start to imagine what could happen if these things ever collided. (And with mobile sports-betting giving a multibillion-dollar boost to already booming revenues, the gambling industry’s sure to push even farther into digital.)
Tech will get more addictive even without doomsday-ish scenarios like hooking Candy Crush up to your bank account. The field of addictive design is built largely on research intended to help us battle our susceptibility to addiction, but as our understanding of addiction broadens, it only teaches us more ways of exploiting it. If we want to see what a truly addictive piece of technology looks like, we only have to let the market keep doing its thing.
No one needs to set out to invent a new kind of digital addiction capable of ruining the lives of millions in order for it to come into being. Putting something online often has unforeseeable, secondary effects, especially if it’s designed for sustained, intensive user engagement. Facebook wasn’t specifically designed to burn down Western democracy, but that doesn’t change how effective it’s been at doing just that. Digital crack could very well come in the form of something genuinely beneficial to most of the people who use it, but liferuiningly bad for a few.
Which is how a lot of the technology we use already works. Some people really do develop eating disorders from social media. Some people really do lose relationships, jobs, and money to their videogame habits. They’re still so few that they’re easy to ignore, but that’s certain to change.
Our phones and laptops and videogame consoles didn’t entwine themselves so deeply into our lives just because they’re convenient or fun. There’s something inherently addictive about interfacing with them, tapping at them and filling our senses with them and letting them take us out of our bodies and transport us into a blue-lit nowhere. Getting out of there and back into the real world can be hard sometimes. And it’s sure to get harder.
The urge to make art boiled on the back burner in his brain, and he soon decided he needed a place to put everything he was making in his spare time. Protected by anonymity, he opened an Instagram account he dubbed @SlimeSunday and started posting.
It was a slow grow, but once it took off, things went viral, and Slime Sunday quickly became revered for his psychedelic digital art featuring warped women with faces that spiral into delectable shapes and colors. His digital work was punchy, warm, and filled with dreamlike patterns akin to an acid trip.
These days, however, Parisella has turned over a new stone: he’s gone analog. He hunts for vintage magazines at every bookstore and record shop in town, then sits down to literally cut and paste flowers, naked women, rockets, and fire; he then rearranges the spliced images into his own freaky, gorgeous collages that his 455K followers can’t get enough of.
“[My work] is a play on contrasting ideas,” the 28-year-old Parisella tells Penthouse. “Beautiful and grotesque are innate opposites, but when you combine them into one composition, the image somehow works. I get a lot of comments saying, ‘This is gross, but I like it.’ That statement itself shouldn’t make sense, but oddly it does.”
As frustrating as social media can be, Parisella recognizes that he has Instagram to thank for his success.
“The fact that a vast majority of people from the entire planet are all connected through one application makes it extremely easy for artists to get their ideas out quickly and effectively,” says Parisella. “Instead of a visual artist going to a curator, or a musician struggling to get a record producer to play their shit, they can just open ut up to the internet and there will most definitely be someone or an entire group of people out there who will like it.”
On the “not” side of the ledger, you’re spared any cheese — in the lyrics or in the sound. Unlike some other contemporary country songs, in a Jinks tune there’s no crossover trendiness, shiny production, overprocessed vocals, or smuggled-in dance beats. There’s zero deference to pop music slickness of any kind. He doesn’t even sing about fun-loving, pickup-truck-powered lifestyles where it’s always summer and babes abound.
Nothing against such a lifestyle, which sounds better than a lot of ways to spend time on this planet. It’s just that Jinks’s inner song compass sends him in a different direction — down a grittier, darker, more real-world road than the paths you find in what’s been dubbed “bro country,” or in the more mainstream-focused country that’s gotten the big radio play over the years, and hews to what’s been called the “Nashville sound.”
In music made by this 39-year-old Fort Worth singer-guitarist, you get an anvil-steady baritone voice — the Texan’s pipes are strong, with a weathered quality, like he’s racked up a lot of mileage on those internal roads. The sound is stripped-down. He’s got an introspective mind-set that falls to brooding with or without the help of whiskey. And he sings lyrics about what tears us up the most inside (like losing love), the state of the world, the anchors of family and friends, and working your tail off at your chosen trade or profession.
In a Jinks song, there’s no sugarcoating. People might chase dreams, but that doesn’t mean they grab ahold of them — life is trickier than that. And some of those who do get to the top, especially the people running things, don’t always get there honestly, with integrity, by dint of their own grindstone efforts.
Jinks has great respect for regular people who stay at it, day in, day out, busting their humps, not complaining, like the woman in “Lifers” — also the name of his 2018 album, which hit No. 2 on the Billboard country chart — who for 20 years has been sticking with her dream of breaking through in Nashville.
“Here’s to the lifers/ The struggle-and-strifers/ Workin’ long after the day is done,” Jinks sings, having saluted a third-generation Waco farmer in an earlier verse, a guy with “mouths to feed and cattle to run.” As for his Nashville dreamer, who came to town “with a guitar and a song,” she’s been “playin’ them rooms but she ain’t got far,” yet there’s a “fire in her soul” that can’t be quenched, and she doesn’t listen to the naysayers.
“They don’t give up and they don’t give in/ When things don’t go their way,” sings this married father of two. And here he might be talking about his own first decade in the music business, which featured a ton of touring, a band breakup, a jump from one music genre to another, and zero help from record labels.
Tall and lean, with a brown bushy beard, tattooed arms, and a preference for T-shirts and jeans, Jinks spent his first six years as the howling, growling singer and rhythm guitarist in a thrash metal band called Unchecked Aggression. A fan of Pantera and Metallica, inspired by Dimebag Darrell and James Hetfield, Jinks gigged perpetually with his band, loading that van a thousand times, until early this century, on a hellish road trip to L.A., when the unit dissolved in the midst of copious drinking and constant squabbling.
Jinks, then 23, gave his frayed voice a rest, pondered his future, and stayed off stages for months. He had a year of junior college under his belt, a freight-dock loading job on his résumé, and not a lot to show for his Texas metal band tenure.
During this period of soul-searching, he picked up his acoustic guitar and noodled a country song. Then he noodled another. And another. It was a return to his musical origins, you could say. He grew up in a house soundtracked with country music. His dad taught him country songs on the guitar at 16. And Jinks’s memories included hearing a Merle Haggard song at age 3 — the earliest memory he has in his head — and his parents running out to see the Kentucky-born honky-tonk king Gary Stewart whenever he came through town.
“It was just one of those full-circle moments, man,” Jinks told the Lubbock Journal in 2015. After countless gigs playing songs like “Hell Razor” and “Smell of Blood,” two tracks on his former thrash band’s 2002 album, The Massacre Begins, he was strumming and singing songs in the genre his parents loved. “I went back to country music,” Jinks added, “because I always wanted to play it live.”
As for what kind of country music he plays — and if you follow this genre at all, you know subcategory slotting can be a loaded issue — people often put him in the “outlaw country” camp. But is that the right place?
“I don’t know any real outlaws,” Jinks told Rolling Stone in 2017. “I pay my taxes.”
The answer illustrates Jinks’s habit of wrestling with the questions that really matter in life, and giving short shrift to those that don’t. Plus, he might be a little hesitant to claim a mantle that belongs to some of his musical heroes, outlaw country icons like Haggard, Johnny Cash, and Waylon Jennings.
That said, the lanky guitarist does wear a lot of black and dispenses with arrangement frills, just like some of his outlaw country predecessors. By his own admission, he left behind Nashville-style gloss after his first country album, which came out in 2008. Also, he’s from Texas, an outlaw country seedbed. And he’s roots enough to embrace the pedal-steel guitar as a worthy addition to a country song.
Moreover, he’s a musician who’s always done things his own way, rather than play the corporate game, kowtowing to a major label, sculpting an image with P.R. handling and social media amplification. What he’s done instead is build his career by writing brilliant songs (check out “I’m Not the Devil,” from a 2016 album of the same name; without assistance from big-label machinery, the record rose to No. 4 on the Billboard country chart) and touring.
“It’s kind of a DIY punk-rock mentality: Just get in the van and go,” he told the Fort Worth Weekly in 2012, shortly before his fourth country album, 30, came out. To Rolling Stone four years later, he said, “I’ve run my country band entirely like a metal band.” Early on, there was a big label interested in grooming him for the country mainstream, both in terms of his music and image. But Jinks said no to that plan, to preserve his independence.
“Too much hand-tying,” he remarked to Rolling Stone last year.
If Jinks doesn’t care to spend a lot of time talking about whether or not he’s a musical outlaw (“When people ask what kind of music we play, I just tell them ‘country,’” he said in 2016 — the ‘we’ meant to include his backing band, The Tone Deaf Hippies), he’s more than happy to discuss the musicians he loves.
“Merle Haggard is the greatest of all time,” he told Billboard in 2016, when the magazine premiered his cover of “The Way I Am,” a song written by Sonny Throckmorton but a hit for Haggard in 1980. Saying no other country artist had influenced him more than Merle Haggard, Jinks added, “The song is about working your ass off, being a man, taking care of business when others wouldn’t, and he’d rather be fishing. I completely relate to that.”
Jinks’s maverick approach has worked. He’s developed a fierce fan base nationwide, to go with those top-selling recent albums. “We go all over the United States, man, and people tell us, ‘Thank you,’” he told Rolling Stone when I’m Not the Devil came out. “I hear ‘Thank you’ more than I hear anything else. There’s no bullshit in our show. There’s no dancing, there’s no sparkle-bottom jeans. We get out there and we rip people’s faces off.”
After putting out his last album with Rounder Records, Jinks is back to his independent ways. Thanks to his bone-deep work ethic, he released not one but two albums on his own new music label, Early August Records, in October. Every song on both efforts displays striking emotional power and artistry, zero glitz or trend-chasing, and no attempts to be anything other than country music.
Like most of us, cannabis enthusiast Antuanette Gomez, founder and CEO of Pleasure Peaks, first smoked weed in high school…just because. When she was nervously taking a hit of a joint, she never imagined that the psychoactive plant would someday become her bread and butter.
“I usually ended up being the one who got too stoned or would just eat everything in the fridge,” the 24-year-old Canadian recalls. “If you would have told me I’d have a successful career in cannabis back then, I’d say you were crazy.
Hailing from Toronto, the entrepreneur, who first trained as a holistic nutritionist, has dedicated herself to enhancing women’s sexual pleasure and health by using the world’s favorite wonder weed. Before launching Pleasure Peaks, Gomez cut her teeth as the executive director for the Canadian branch of Women Grow, an international organization focused on female leadership in the cannabis industry. While there, she mentored various cannabis startups seeking guidance on navigating the legal side of the industry.
Last year, Gomez was named a Forbes Under 30 Scholar, a program recognizing young entrepreneurs, and in 2017 Toronto Life magazine saluted her influence shaping the new pot landscape. These days, with her career soaring and life on the move, she is gearing up for the spring 2020 release of Pleasure Peaks products in the U.S. and Canadian markets.
At its inception in 2015, Pleasure Peaks used cannabis to help patients at a local chronic pain clinic dealing with endometriosis and cervical cancer. Four years later, Pleasure Peaks now offers cannabis education; workshops to help couples bring cannabis into the bedroom; live programming on their YouTube channel; and “Pampered Pussy Spa Days,” complete with hemp oil manicures, mimosas, and CBD detox teas.
The time seemed right to catch up with the dynamic Gomez, a pioneer in a rapidly expanding world where weed, women, and sexual health come together.
What inspired Pleasure Peaks?
I was a student of holistic nutrition, focused on how natural ingredients heal various ailments. When I began learning about cannabis, I realized Health Canada had already been using cannabis as a medical treatment for over 20 years. As a result of my work in a chronic pain clinic, I became increasingly curious about how plants, and cannabis in particular, could be combined with other modalities to treat chronic pain. I wanted to make people’s lives better through cannabis, because I saw from experience the positive impact it had on patients who were able to access that type of care.
The more I learned about chronic pain, the more I became aware of women who suffer from sexual pain. It also became evident that this experience is common for women, and that treatment resources are limited. Women have been suffering in silence for too long due to the stigma surrounding female sexual health and pleasure. I realized a huge gap existed in the market for medical products to help women manage sexual pain, and so it became my personal mission to fill that void.
It takes a certain type of courage to advocate for women’s sexual health within the context of the cannabis industry, but I’m determined to see how far I can go.
How do you see cannabis impacting the future of healthcare?
Cannabis has so many amazing medicinal properties and we’re just scratching the surface. I’m a cannabis geek and always interested in the latest technology and research. Sexual health is the least studied and funded area when it comes to the human body.
What’s the biggest misconception about the cannabis industry?
That cannabis is simply recreational. The general population still thinks that users just want to get high, but our job is to show them a different perspective on cannabis consumption. People are using cannabis in their sex lives to mitigate sexual anxieties, to push past sexual traumas, and increase trust and intimacy in relationships. We believe that cannabis can help us redefine the peaks of pleasure.
In America, there will always be certain states resisting this changed perspective. Why do you think Canada has been so supportive on a governmental level?
To put it simply, cannabis is part of Canadian culture, and we are super proud of that. In Canada, cannabis has been legal for medical use for over two decades. Canada has been at the forefront of cultivation and genetics, and we plan to keep it that way. With federal legalization in October 2018, we have seen Canada make major plays in international cannabis trading in Europe, Australia, South America, and the Caribbean. Cannabis is the biggest industry of the millennial generation and every country is trying to get a piece of the pie. Luckily for us, Canada is leading the way.
Why does cannabis make so much sense for the female body?
There are innumerable ways that cannabis can be used to improve sexual health and pleasure among women. Cannabis is a vasodilator for women just like Viagra is for men. Cannabis can be used topically to achieve similar effects, like increased blood flow to the genitals and greater sensitivity—these benefits are unique to women. Cannabis also helps to relax vaginal muscles to make it easier for women to achieve orgasm. It can help with sexual anxiety, especially when smoked or inhaled with a vape. Cannabis helps to lessen menstrual pain and general vaginal discomfort, and also manage pain from endometriosis. Perhaps most profound, cannabis can assist with the complex forms of pain inflicted upon survivors of rape. We have developed 16 different products to help ease these types of pain.
You can find Antuanette Gomez on Instagram at @antuanetteg, or check out Pleasure Peaks at pleasurepeaks.com.